Web54 Jenkins, L.J. in Danish Mercantile Co., Ltd. v. Beaumont (supra) pp. 686 – 687 Google Scholar, where it is plain that he means a meeting of members; and Danckwerts, J. in Pavlides v. Jensen (supra) pp. 576 – 577 Google Scholar (where it is true that the directors themselves were defendants). Web(Danish Mercantile Co. Ltd. v. Beaumont—C.A. —(1951), 1 All E. R., 925). I n view o f the frequency with which undertakings are given and accepted on the completion o f sales …

Commission v. Denmark UNEP Law and Environment Assistance …

Web5 Danish Mercantile Co. Ltd. v. Beaumont [1951] Ch. 680, 686-687 per Jenkins L.J., where the directors' powers to manage under the articles appear not to have been any … ray ut type r

Altwiki

WebA majority shareholder attempted to start litigation in the company's name against the managing director. The board challenged the litigation, arguing it had no authority to do … WebAn action for slander of title was available from at least the end of the sixteenth century 2 so that an oral denial of the claimant's title to land, preventing him from leasing or selling it, was actionable. Despite its name, this action was not derived or descended from the defamation torts of libel and slander. 3 Rather, it was an action on the case for special damage … WebCoastalstyle Pty Ltd v The Proprietors “Surf Regency” BUP No 4246 [1995] 1 Qd R 132 – applied. Danish Mercantile Co Ltd v Beaumont [1951] Ch 680 – cited. Hollis Holdings Pty Ltd v PJ Handley and Ors [2002] QDC 1 – followed. Re Manias (1986) 15 FCR 1 – cited. Northside Developments Pty Ltd v Registrar General (1990) 170 CLR 146 ... simply shropshire cottages